A Microsoft Lie to Behold...

      This is a screenshot of the Microsoft stock quote from 1986 to today, The Microsoft quote reads over a length of 18 years that stocks are down .75% the picture misleads you into believing that the stock quote during that period of time, is actually on a steady plateau when the words do the speaking. If Microsoft stocks are down .75% from 1986 being that I clicked the "MAX" button, how can the graph show stocks at over 40. points? Is the server that maintains the stock quotes a Microsoft server? I'm guessing yes. How better to masquerade your lie and your Corporate demon other than with a tool you created? Either the "Max" button doesn't exude actual figures or it does.

      I'm guessing Microsoft is playing charades with their stock prices, they're using body language and acting like the actual figures are tip top when in reality, the company is broke because of their mistreatment of customers and that's why they're selling the data they collect through their servers at Microsoft, from your electronic devices to government agencies. You have to keep the empty pockets a secret so that you can collect more data from your users. LMAO! SERIOUSLY?

      Also... Apparently Google tracks stock in real time which is pretty cool because by the time I wrote this article Microsoft stocks rose .04%, It must be bad luck huh Bill Gates? Satya Nadella? Weird how I notice things then it reverses itself. 

      Are majority stockholders at Microsoft keeping the devil alive with donations?? Does that mean you're OpenSource now? Or is that just DOS? Is there value in asshole scrap? Nope, just turds!

      I have a clue how cable companies and channels are gouge scalping ratings though volume control. They'll get your rating whether you like it or not! Well it's coming through loud and clear he must be watching T.V. right? "OOoops!" 

      Is Microsoft also implementing a ratings system to rejuevenate their stock prices instead of user numbers and profits? We'd have to ask the IEEE if that is legal? Ok if it's legal, is it ethical to change the rules because you don't like the way the game is being played? I guess user numbers could technically be ratings but then you're using your users as currency. I think somewhere in the IEEE SOP or in Civil Rights Acts somewhere there must be a LAW that makes what you're doing illegal and UNETHICAL! What is the first thing you MUST have to maintain your business??? 

      ETHICS is the answer! I guess it's monkey see monkey do? Correct Bill Gates? Satya Nadella?

https://www.google.com/search?q=Microsoft+stocks&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb

Note: On every post I make I have 1 Google+ LOL. Bill Gates must be "supporting" me, he hangs on to everyword. LMMFAO! OK do something about what you're doing to me... That's support too. Apparently I must also conjunct non-conjuctive words. It only gets better MS Serfs! It's now serfing the WorldWide Web. LOL Not "Surfing."