Saturday, March 29, 2014

What I've written about MicroSound on facebook....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsound

      The link is my source, for the information pertaining to the development of current mind hacking applications. It sounds crazy, but believe me, it's true. And one can not deny the possibility given today's technological advancements.

What I've written on facebook on the development of the current use of MicroSound... Sounds an awful lot like MicroSoft doesn't it?

       "What they're showing here could be updated for use with WiFi. I'm talking language compatibility bridging; switches; hubs; access points; routers etc. if you update the article with modern terminology it sounds something like electronic DNA bridging compatibility system (cuckold. look this word up.) We all know electronic DNA does not exist but DNA does. 

Now think in psychological aspects. You can emulate psychological disorders that don't even exist within a person (e.g. Multiple personality disorder) with technology like this, all you need is switch technology, EEG graph readings and from a target subject or 2 or more people. 

I had mentioned in a previous article that the human brain runs on 8-42Hz, if you read the wikipedia article (noted wiki is not always correct) the article states the Microsound development runs between 28Hz - 28Khz. The signal strength and frequency falls within the range of 8-42Hz. Believe me, if this happens to you, you will know because it hurts very bad. I have a feeling local law enforcement officers like to use technology like this to manipulate people into believing that the US government is performing tests on citizens. What the citizen doesn't take note of is the police department undertone. Keep these things in mind. Police also could and will use this technology to cover up or hide any crimes committed by the police or the policeman's fraternal brother. Once again, source for this information is the wiki-link above, and I also hold the notion that, not all information distributed on "Wikipedia" is true but, unfortunately a lot is to either an extent or to fullness of the articles."

No comments: